|
|
| In this area I have three,
inter-related, concerns. First, how does the pattern of social
relationships (and the associated norms) affect development
outcomes. Second, how is project success related to both the
larger environment and specific project design issues.
Third, how are social capital and local governance related?
Social capital
Participation and Project Performance
Social Capital and Local Governance
Other sites
Comments, Puzzles
|
| Social Capital
Scenes
from a Marriage: World Bank Economists and Social Capital.
This is a chapter from a forthcoming book edited by Tony
Bebbington, Michael Woolcock, and Scott Guggenheim, and E. Ostrom
about the concept of social capital. Together with Jeffrey
Hammer we look at it from the economist's view.
Cents and Sociability: Household Income and Social Capital in Rural
Tanzania. (with Deepa Narayan). Economic Development and Cultural
Change, 1999, vol. 47 (4). (download working
paper version). Empirical work that identifies the social
impact of associational life. Estimates quite large
impacts of a measure of associational life on village consumption
expenditures (proxy for income) as well as other dimensions of
village like. The work taking advantage of the fact that a
"social capital" survey took place in the same villages
that a year earlier had had a multi-module living standards survey
but with different households. So the
"social" effect was estimated by examining the
multivariate regressions of outcomes for one set of households on
the measured village associational life that was measured using a
completely different set of households.
|
| Local Governance Voice
Lessons: Local Government Organizations, Social Organizations, and
the Quality of Local Governance
with
Vivi Alatas and Anna Wetterberg. October 2002.
An
empirical examination of the connection between household's social
activities and their perceived quality of local (village) government
in Indonesia. We find that the private and the social effect
of household participation in local village government organizations
are of opposite signs and that one household's participation appears
to "crowd out" participation by other households more than
one for one.
Presentations of this paper put the paper in context--for
instance at Delhi Universities Institute for Economic Growth--voice_lessons_ieg.ppt.
|
| Project Design/Participation
There are two papers: micro--which looks at the
relation between project performance and beneficiary participation
for 121 water projects, and a macro--that looks at the relationship
between the performance of World Bank financed projects and country
characteristics--particularly civil liberties.
Does Participation Improve Performance?: Establishing Causality with
Subjective Data. (with Jonathan Isham, Deepa Narayan) World Bank Economic Review 9(2):
175-200 (1995). Uses data from121 water projects that had
information about project characteristics coded ex post from
project documents. Uses the feature that the project
"data" was created by two independent coders to address
questions of "halo effects" and the validity of the
subjective rankings. Shows the empirical connections at each
stage: from a design that encourages participation to more
participation to improved project performance.
Civil
Liberties, Democracy, and the Performance of Government
Projects. (with Jon Isham and
Daniel Kaufmann). World Bank Economic Review, v 11
(2). Uses the large sample of projects financed by the
World Bank to show that the economic rate of return (and success
rate) on government projects is higher in countries with better
civil liberties (controlling for country income, education,
etc.).
The determinants of the magnitude and effectiveness of
participation: Evidence from rural water projects.
This paper, never really published, used the same data on 121
water projects to show that NGO projects were more successful only
insofar as they promoted participation. This tries to examine
the determinants of whether a project was or was not "participatory"
as a function of sponsor of the project, etc.
This was a presentation and is my first attempt at a typology for
participation--"Participation:
What, Who, Why and When."
|
|
| Other Sites
This is not intended as an overview of a large,
and growing, literature, but just my, particular, view. In this area
perhaps the best place to start is with my co-authors.
Deepa
Narayan has done interesting work all over the globe on
participation, social capital, and most recently the project on
"Voices
of the Poor."
Michael
Woolcock has written extensively on social capital (and his
forthcoming book on social capital and development will be the state
of the art).
Jon
Isham is doing very interesting work on
"co-production" and its relation to social capital and
proejct design.
The World Bank Social
Capital web site is also a good source.
The Local
Level Institutions Study produced research in several countries
on social capital issues, including a number of papers by Christian
Grootaert.
Alberto
Alesina does interesting work on fractionalization (with Eliana
Ferrara, who does interesting work of her own). Edward
Glaeser examines mostly the private dimensions of social
capital, that is how households own social connections affect
outcomes.
Also, there is a web site at University of Rome on social
capital that looks like it has an impressive collection of
references.
|
| Comments, Puzzles
[Unfinished]
|
|